Remember Me     Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Hang Tuah - Malay or Chinese Warrior?

More
15 years 2 months ago #31645 by Maeztro
a\'akom kawan2 semuer....disini aku nak share ttg blog yg aku jumpa waktu tgh swimming tadi.....

A reader sent this:-
Why was Hang Tuah taken off the history text books since 1999??

Way back in 1987, a Malay (from the old school) told me of his suspicion that Hang Tuah was Chinese. Notice that Hang Tuah, Hang Jebat and Hang Lekiu carry the same surname, Hang? Malays don\'t have surnames. Hang Tuah is the eldest so \'tuah\' which means big or elder in some Chinese dialects, e.g. Hokkien. Further, Hang Tuah brought a Chinese princess to marry the Sultan of Malacca. Her name? Hang Li Po. One inaccuracy in the evidence cited below. The relevant Chinese emperor is from the Ming Dynasty not Qing (or Ching). Even today, the Agong wears yellow and has a yellow umbrella on ceremonial occasion. They were bestowed by the Ming Emperor.

Original Message
Subject: Why was Hang Tuah taken off the history text books since 1999??
Read all about it! REASON WHY IN SEJARAH OF MALAYSIA SINCE YEAR 1999
Study about HANG TUAH is MISSING ?????
\"The Truth Reveal (with evidence)\"
Local research project to compliment the history studies that we undertaken in our secondary school. In June 1998, the government of Malaysia had hired a team of experts The objective of the research is simply:-
1. To find prove and evident that show the Malays are the origins of Malaysia and they are the first race and religion that lands their foot in Malaysia .
2. To further strengthen their claims, first they need to find the grave yard of the Hang Tuah, Hang Jebat, Hang Lekiu and etc..to show the existant of their pioneer.
3. The Batu Bersurat in Terengganu, reveals that the islamic religion has landed in Malaysia for a hundred years ago which further strengthen their claims! That is why, we are taught with (history of Malaysia )!!!!

BEWARE & OPEN YOUR EYES!!! go ask your brother, sister, niece, newphew and etc. etc, since the year 1999 (if i\'m not mistaken) or year 2000, do they study about HANG TUAH anymore???????? Why is that popular subject GONE????? Missing in action??????? Or Evidence reveals something different that causes the government to stop the syllabus and HIDE the TRUTH????????

Here are the Evidences of the findings by the team of scientists, archaeologist, historian and other technical staff from the United State, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Yemen & Russia. The evidence are:
1) They finally found the grave yard of Hang Tuah, Hang Jebat and etc..., their skeleton had been analise and samples of DNA had been taken with the results show Hang Tuah, Hang Jebat, Hang Lekiu and mates, they are not Malay!!!!!! They are CHINESE! (islamic) from China!!! and why are they here in Malacca????? Because they are in a misison to protect the MALAY from the potential attack of SIAM ( Thailand )!!! So Hang Tuah is not malay hero!!! they are the protector of the useless and ungrateful Parameswara (who is from INDONESIA ) landed in Malacca and claim the land belongs to him!! The Hang Tuah bunch of people are all from China, they are being assign to Malacca because Parameswara request the Ching Dynasty Emporer for protection!!! This is why the Hang Tuah series of history is MISSING from the SEJARAH!!!!

2) Evidence: The researchers hired by the government found the oldest tomb stone (grave yard) in Kelantan in year 2000. Suprisingly the tomb stone are at least 900 years old!!!! older than the so-called Batu Bersurat. and the best thing is, it belong to the Chinese. Being landed first in Malacca doesn\'t mean Malay is the first in Malaysia cos during that time, the road is too long for them to see the other side of the coast!!! ! where the chinese has landed far more earlier.

If you want the black and white evidence of the truth reveals please write to: The Federal Association of Arc & Research of Michigan, USA


Can anyone verify/clarify the above statements? The above statements could be totally or factually wrong. Any historians out there? Best part is it mentioned that they found Hang Tuah\'s grave .... I don\'t think it was that hard as I found it too together with many other tourists while having an excursion in Malacca there ...... means to say I\'m part of history too...haha!

Reading: Hang Tuah\'s Origin - Danielctw (good assessment/study of the same topic)
Reading: Hang Tuah Bukan Berbangsa Melayu - UMNO Reform
Reading: Parameswara didn\'t convert, Hang Tuah not Chinese - Malaysiakini

Tags: Education, Malaysian History, Sejarah, Hang Tuah, Hang Jebat, Hang Lekiu, Hang Li Po, Sultan of Malacca, Ming Dynasty, Qing Dynasty, Ching Dynasty, Chinese Emperor, Federal Association of Arc & Research of Michigan, China, Chinese, Islamic, Malay, Batu Bersurat, Parameswara, Indonesia, Siam, Thailand

Labels: Education, Malaysia, Politics


posted by Johnny Ong at Friday, June 29, 2007 :unsure:


Full details :http://johnny-ong.blogspot.com/2007/06/hang-tuah-malay-or-chinese-warrior.html
More
15 years 2 months ago #31683 by Sky_Hanz
Statement kat atas boleh kerr nak pertikaikan semua tue, apa bukti yg ade dlm buku sejarah xcukup lagi.. smpai ade yg nak seleweng kan fakta, org belanda pon percaya kan hang tuah dri tanah melayu... siap bole melakonkan watk hang tuah lagi, kalau ade yg nak pertikai kan nye kenapa x g jer muzium melaka cri bukti kat sana.. Kalau btol apa yg dorang jumap tue, kuar kan kat berita la.. Tunjuk kan kat 1 Malaysia la, apa bukti yg mayat tu hang tuah?? Apa saja org boleh letak kat Blog

\"Here are the Evidences of the findings by the team of scientists, archaeologist, historian and other technical staff from the United State, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, Yemen & Russia. The evidence are:
1) They finally found the grave yard of Hang Tuah, Hang Jebat and etc...\"


Ni bila nyer citer?? sapa ahli2 tue?? Kat mana dorang jumpa kubuq tue??
Dlm suratkabar org putih pon xpnah kuar, aku siap search lagi tdi.. apa jadah nak menipu org pkai blog.. Sampah la kalau nak post kat blog pasal statement yg xder reference..

Anyway thanks la sbb statement diatas berjaya buat aku gelak gak pagi nie.. :laugh:
More
14 years 11 months ago #34207 by khumaira
Assalamualaikum....

dh lame dgr citer ni....fakta yg diberi mrk tu semua berbangsa cina...
xpelah sky..jgn marah2 yer....

dia org saje nk buat research tu...biar bangsa apapun...yg kak umai baca mrk semua masuk agama islam...kak umai sejarah2 ni lembab ckit....subjek paling x suka..

semoga roh mrk dicucuri rahmat...

oh ye sky...cbuk nmpk skrg ni....dh x nmpk kak umai lg....:(
More
14 years 11 months ago #34231 by redzha
zzzzz.....stupid yer chinese ...membuat andaian tanpa faktaa....
kaum cina nie semua nak bolot....ekonomi nak bolot.politik dia buat cara pemainan dia....sekarang sejarah melayu polak dia nak sentuh...!!!nie sudah lebihhhhh.........dasarrrr org cinaaa nie nk monopoly semua......
busuk yer cina...mati kujut...x hidup pon x aa pe......


:angry: :angry: :angry: :ohmy: :ohmy: :evil: :evil: :negative: :negative: :negative: :negative: :negative:
More
14 years 11 months ago - 14 years 11 months ago #34232 by Sky_Hanz
khumaira tulis:

Assalamualaikum....

dh lame dgr citer ni....fakta yg diberi mrk tu semua berbangsa cina...
xpelah sky..jgn marah2 yer....

dia org saje nk buat research tu...biar bangsa apapun...yg kak umai baca mrk semua masuk agama islam...kak umai sejarah2 ni lembab ckit....subjek paling x suka..

semoga roh mrk dicucuri rahmat...

oh ye sky...cbuk nmpk skrg ni....dh x nmpk kak umai lg....:(


Adess.... xper la benda tue kak umai, lantok la dorang tue...
Skang ni mmg agak bz la, mcm2 nak kena wat skang nie... :P
Last edit: 14 years 11 months ago by Sky_Hanz.
Time to create page: 0.445 seconds